Last updated:
Journalist
Hassan Shittu
Journalist
Hassan Shittu
Share
Why Trust Cryptonews
Key Takeaways:
- Banks gain a broader scope to offer crypto services under established oversight.
- Institutions must report crypto activity, preserving monitoring without pre-approval.
- The update reflects regulatory practice aligning traditional banking with digital trends.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued new guidance this week that cleared the way for supervised banks in the United States to engage in crypto-related activities without seeking prior approval, signaling a shift in its regulatory stance.
Outlined in Financial Institution Letter (FIL-7-2025), the policy rescinded a 2022 requirement that banks notify the FDIC before starting any crypto-related operations.
The change is part of a broader reexamination of how federal agencies treat digital assets in the banking sector.
FDIC Updates Crypto Oversight: Notification Still Required, Approval Dropped
FDIC Acting Chairman Travis Hill said the new guidance marked a departure from the more restrictive policies implemented over the past three years.
“I expect this to be one of several steps the FDIC will take to lay out a new approach for how banks can engage in crypto- and blockchain-related activities in accordance with safety and soundness standards,” Hill stated.
Under the revised policy, FDIC-supervised banks are now allowed to pursue crypto-related services, provided they manage associated risks and comply with existing regulations on safety and soundness.
While prior approval is no longer necessary, banks must still notify the FDIC if they are already involved in or intend to pursue crypto activities.
The agency will then review the submitted information and may provide feedback or further supervision.
Still, the agency remains cautious. The FDIC stated that while it recognizes ongoing developments in financial services, crypto-related activities continue to pose risks — including those tied to market volatility, consumer protection, and anti-money laundering compliance.
The agency also confirmed it will continue collaborating with the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets and other banking regulators to refine its oversight of digital asset activities across the financial system.
Wider Regulatory Context and Coordination
This change comes amid growing calls for federal banking regulators to provide clearer guidance on crypto integration.
The FDIC said it would work with other federal agencies to revise outdated interagency statements related to digital assets and banking.
Although the new stance reduces regulatory friction, oversight remains in place.
Banks must still demonstrate that they can conduct crypto-related operations safely while protecting customers and complying with legal standards.
FDIC Reconsiders Crypto Restrictions Following Industry Pushback
For years, U.S. banks that experimented with crypto services encountered regulatory obstacles.
Some reportedly received informal warnings instructing them to pause activities such as digital asset custody and tokenized deposits.
Industry figures referred to these efforts as part of “Operation Chokepoint 2.0” — an alleged campaign to restrict lawful crypto services through opaque enforcement rather than public rulemaking.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill cited over 20 instances where banks were discouraged from offering crypto services without any formal regulatory process.
Hill called for a reevaluation of how rules like the Bank Secrecy Act are applied, warning against their misuse to deny lawful banking access.
In response to both internal reviews and external pressure, the FDIC now appears to be taking a more open position.
Recent discussions suggest growing interest in blockchain-based infrastructure and tokenized deposits.
The agency has also removed “reputational risk” as a factor in bank supervision — a change that follows the Senate Banking Committee’s passage of the Fair Access to Banking Act (FIRM Act).
The move aligns with a similar decision by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and may signal a more consistent approach across federal banking agencies.
Crypto commentators, including David Sacks, the White House’s AI and crypto czar, welcomed the decision.
Advocates say it may help establish a more transparent regulatory environment for banks engaged in lawful digital asset services.
With this shift from the FDIC, banks now face fewer procedural obstacles when entering the crypto space — though regulatory compliance and sound risk management remain mandatory.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Banks adopt integrated risk management by merging traditional controls with new digital safeguards. Frequent system audits, stress evaluations, and data analysis routines help maintain secure crypto frameworks.
Institutions combine digital safety steps with usual methods to secure transactions. Regular internal reviews and data checks work to lower risks, keeping operations compliant with established practices.
Regulators might adjust crypto rules prompting banks to upgrade digital systems and risk controls. This shift pushes banks to enhance their digital practices while ensuring secure, compliant operations.
Credit: Source link
