Close Menu
AsiaTokenFundAsiaTokenFund
  • Home
  • Crypto News
    • Bitcoin
    • Altcoin
  • Web3
    • Blockchain
  • Trading
  • Regulations
    • Scams
  • Submit Article
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • DMCA
What's Hot

The Graph Backs x402 and ERC-8004 Standards for AI Agent Economy

February 3, 2026

Why Is Moscow Exchange to Launch Solana, XRP, and TRX Futures Now?

February 3, 2026

Coinbase Accuses Australia’s Big Four Banks of ‘Unlawful’ Crypto Debanking

February 3, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
AsiaTokenFundAsiaTokenFund
ATF Capital
  • Home
  • Crypto News
    • Bitcoin
    • Altcoin
  • Web3
    • Blockchain
  • Trading
  • Regulations
    • Scams
  • Submit Article
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • DMCA
AsiaTokenFundAsiaTokenFund

Lido holds demand after Hayes’ 2.3mln transfer – Yet ONE risk won’t go away

0
By Aggregated - see source on February 3, 2026 Altcoin
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Arthur Hayes’ decision to move 2.31 million LDO, valued at nearly $980K, into FalconX landed at a sensitive moment for Lido Dao. 

Price already traded near a key demand zone, so the transfer naturally intensified market attention. 

Large deposits often raise distribution concerns, especially when the structure leans bearish. However, Hayes has historically used prime brokers for liquidity routing, not immediate exits. 

This inflow increased the available centralized supply exactly as buyers attempted to stabilize the price near support.

Traders responded cautiously rather than emotionally. Volume did not spike aggressively, yet positioning tightened. 

As a result, this move became less about intent and more about market reaction. The transfer now tests whether demand can absorb added liquidity without triggering renewed downside pressure for Lido Dao [LDO].

LDO price leans on demand as structure stays corrective

LDO continued to trade under a heavy corrective structure despite holding near demand. Price stabilized around the $0.41–$0.42 zone at press time, which has attracted buyers repeatedly. 

However, rebounds continue to fade quickly.

The $0.53 region acted as a clear lower high, while the $0.70 marked the broader breakdown level that shifted market control. 

Each recovery attempt stalls below resistance, reinforcing bearish structure.

Buyers defend demand but struggle to extend momentum. This behavior reflects hesitation, not conviction. Therefore, price remains boxed between defense and pressure. 

Until buyers reclaim higher levels with follow-through, the broader structure remains corrective. Demand may slow declines, yet it has not reversed direction.

LDO price action analysis

Source: TradingView

Directional Movement Index data confirmed that sellers still dominate trend direction. The –DI held near 35, while +DI remained suppressed around 7, showing a clear imbalance. 

At the same time, ADX sat near 43, well above the 25 threshold that signals strong directional trends. 

This combination matters since strong ADX paired with elevated –DI showed that selling pressure remains organized, not random. 

Short-term stabilization does little to weaken this structure. Buyers may defend levels, but they do not control direction yet. 

Until +DI rises meaningfully and ADX cools, sellers maintain authority. Therefore, any upside attempts still face structural resistance rather than open air.

Buyers absorb supply without chasing price

Spot Taker CVD revealed persistent buyer dominance beneath the surface. Despite bearish structure and added supply from the Hayes transfer, aggressive market participants continue lifting offers. 

Buyers do not wait passively.

Instead, they step in near demand, absorbing sell pressure without triggering panic. 

This behavior signals intent rather than fear. However, absorption alone does not guarantee reversal. Buyers defend levels, yet they fail to force expansion. 

As a result, the price stabilizes instead of trending. This dynamic suggests accumulation under pressure rather than capitulation. 

Therefore, the market now tests buyer endurance. Sustained taker demand must eventually overwhelm sellers, or absorption risks turn into exhaustion.

LDO Spot Taker CVDLDO Spot Taker CVD

Source: CryptoQuant

LDO liquidity clusters hint at violent resolution

The Binance LDO/USDT Liquidation Heatmap showed dense leverage clusters surrounding the aforementioned price.

Heavy liquidity sat above $0.43, while long exposure stacked below $0.40. These zones act like magnets during volatility spikes. 

Price was compressed between them, explaining the recent choppy movement. 

Traders hesitate, while leverage quietly rebuilds. If price pushes upward, short liquidations above $0.43 could fuel a fast squeeze. 

However, a drop below $0.40 would expose clustered long liquidations, accelerating downside. This balance keeps volatility suppressed for now. 

Nevertheless, compression rarely lasts. As liquidity thickens, the next expansion likely targets one side aggressively.

Source: CoinGlass

Conclusion 

Lido Dao stood at a fragile crossroads. Arthur Hayes’ transfer increased supply, yet buyers continue absorbing pressure through aggressive taker activity. 

However, sellers still control the broader trend. With liquidity tightly stacked above and below the price, volatility appears delayed rather than resolved. 

The next decisive move will likely emerge from a liquidity sweep, not a gradual drift. Until that resolution occurs, LDO remains trapped between demand defense and structural pressure.


Final Thoughts

  • Arthur Hayes moved 2.31 million LDO into FalconX near demand, increasing supply as price hovered around $0.41–$0.42.
  • Liquidity clusters near $0.43 and $0.40 suggest a sharp breakout or breakdown once buyers or sellers lose control.
Previous: Ethereum rethinks L2 role as activity rises but value secured declines
Next: Is altseason finally brewing? Only if THESE 2 indicators flip first

Credit: Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Why Is Moscow Exchange to Launch Solana, XRP, and TRX Futures Now?

February 3, 2026

Coinbase Accuses Australia’s Big Four Banks of ‘Unlawful’ Crypto Debanking

February 3, 2026

CoinRoutes Co-Founder Alleges “Coordinated” Manipulation Behind October Crypto Crash

February 3, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

What's New Here!

The Graph Backs x402 and ERC-8004 Standards for AI Agent Economy

February 3, 2026

Why Is Moscow Exchange to Launch Solana, XRP, and TRX Futures Now?

February 3, 2026

Coinbase Accuses Australia’s Big Four Banks of ‘Unlawful’ Crypto Debanking

February 3, 2026

CoinRoutes Co-Founder Alleges “Coordinated” Manipulation Behind October Crypto Crash

February 3, 2026
AsiaTokenFund
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
  • Home
  • Crypto News
    • Bitcoin
    • Altcoin
  • Web3
    • Blockchain
  • Trading
  • Regulations
    • Scams
  • Submit Article
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • DMCA
© 2026 asiatokenfund.com - All Rights Reserved!

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.